State v. Quintero Morelos
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 The day following sentencing, the judge decided to reduce the sentence by one day, which prevented the defendant’s federal deportation, because defense counsel failed at the time of the original sentencing to inform the judge that the defendant was subject to deportation. The question presented is whether the judge had discretionary authority to set aside the judgment on the ground of neglect or carelessness of defense counsel. We conclude that he did and we affirm that exercise of discretion.
Schultheis, J.
FACTS
¶ 2 A jury found Ignacio Quintero Morelos guilty of fourth degree assault…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. GoreWashington Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. RohrichWashington Supreme Court · 2003
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Lontz v. TharpWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2007
- State v. Quintero MorelosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- INTERNET COMM. & ENTERTAINMENT CORP. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Internet Community & Entertainment Corp. v. Washington State Gambling CommissionCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- State v. SilveraCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.