Legal Opinion

Ernest Lowenstein, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 16, 1973No. R.D. 11776; Court No. R64/2246PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Maletz, Judge:

The issue in this appeal for reappraisement is the correct dutiable value of certain glass stones, pendants, beads and similar merchandise (hereinafter referred to as “stones and beads”) that were exported from Austria, the country of manufacture, in March 1963 and entered at the port of New York in April 1963. The *202merchandise was appraised on the basis of export value as defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1030, as amended, at the entered invoiced unit values pirn 14.3 percent.

Plaintiff agrees that expoi’t value is the proper basis for appraisement but contends that…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. United States v. F. W. Myers & Co.United States Customs Court · 1969
  2. Myerson Tooth Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  3. Myerson Tooth Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  4. American Greiner Electronic, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1969
  5. C. J. Tower & Sons of Niagara, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ernest Lowenstein, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1977
  2. United States v. Ernest Lowenstein, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API