Legal Opinion
Berry v. Wiseman
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Decided October 3, 1958No. Civ. 7833PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIZLEY, District Judge.
This action having been tried before the Court, a jury trial having been waived, the Court makes and files the follow ing Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law:
Findings of Fact
From the sworn testimony of witnesses, the Court concludes the following to be facts:
I
That during the year 1954, the plaintiffs, James E. and Edwina M. Berry, installed an elevator in their home at 502 Duck Street, Stillwater, Oklahoma, at a cost of $4,457.84; and that said amount was not reimbursed by insurance.
II
That said installation was made and ■expense incurred upon advice of a competent…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Edna G. Hollander v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1955
3Cited by5 opinions
- Gerard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- John Riach and Maude M. Riach, His Wife v. William E. Frank, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Morrissey v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
- Gerard v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1962
- Lerew v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982