United States v. Baez
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
STAHL, Circuit Judge.
In United States v. Sparks, 711 F.3d 58 (1st Cir.2013), we held that the warrant-less installation of a global positioning system (GPS) device on a defendant’s automobile and the use of that device to monitor his and a co-defendant’s movements for eleven days fell within the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule, because the monitoring had occurred before the Supreme Court decided that the installation and use of a GPS tracker on a car constitutes a Fourth Amendment search. See United States v. Jones, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 945, 181 L.Ed.2d 911 (2012). Today, we are…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- United States v. BainCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- United States v. OladosuCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Dwan TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
- United States v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
- United States v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.