Legal Opinion

United States v. Baez

Court of Appeals for the First Circuit

Decided February 28, 2014No. 13-1025PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STAHL, Circuit Judge.

In United States v. Sparks, 711 F.3d 58 (1st Cir.2013), we held that the warrant-less installation of a global positioning system (GPS) device on a defendant’s automobile and the use of that device to monitor his and a co-defendant’s movements for eleven days fell within the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule, because the monitoring had occurred before the Supreme Court decided that the installation and use of a GPS tracker on a car constitutes a Fourth Amendment search. See United States v. Jones, — U.S. —, 132 S.Ct. 945, 181 L.Ed.2d 911 (2012). Today, we are…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Herring v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. United States v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. KnottsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. BainCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
  2. United States v. OladosuCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
  3. United States v. Dwan TaylorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2015
  4. United States v. PerezCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  5. United States v. PattersonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API