State v. Murrell
West Virginia Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
WORKMAN, Chief Justice:
Mark Randal Murrell (hereinafter “Appellant”) appeals the imposition of a $20,000 fine after a plea of guilty to two counts of third degree sexual assault. The Appellant contends that the fines and costs constitute a violation of statutory and constitutional principles. We are not persuaded by the Appellant’s argument, and we affirm the decision of the lower court, except to the extent that the lower court would require payment of attorney fees within thirty days, in conflict with West Virginia Code § 29 — 21—16(g)(3) (1992), providing that the order is not enforceable…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- San Antonio Independent School District v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bearden v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Williams v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Tate v. ShortSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- State v. GoodnightWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. AllenWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. WoodsonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2008
- State ex rel. Holcomb v. NibertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- State ex rel. Holcomb v. NibertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2002
- State of West Virginia v. Amy Jo MalcombWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.