Legal Opinion

Harris, Richard v. Geise

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided May 9, 2024No. 3:22-cv-00387Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN RICHARD PAUL HARRIS, Plaintiff, OPINION and ORDER v. 22-cv-387-wmc CHRISTOPHER GEISE, Defendants. Plaintiff Richard Harris, who is representing himself, contends that Juneau County Sheriff Lt. Christopher Geise tased him repeatedly and unnecessarily in violation of his constitutional rights. Defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff failed to exhaust his administrative remedies, as well as a motion for summary judgment on the merits. Because the record shows that plaintiff exhausted his…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kingsley v. HendricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
  3. Rodosvaldo Pozo v. Gary McCaughtry Randall Gerritson, and David HautamakiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
  4. Alfredo Miranda v. County of LakeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018
  5. Bobby Ford v. Donald JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API