Legal Opinion

Brown v. Secretary of the Department of Health & Human Services

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided December 19, 1995No. 90-3381VPublished

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MEROW, Judge.

Introduction

This matter comes before the Court on Petitioners’ Motion for Review of Special Master Elizabeth E. Wright’s June 30, 1995 order dismissing their petition for compensation under § 300aa-ll(a)(6) of the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Act (‘Vaccine Act” or “Act”), 42 U.S.C. § 300aa-10-34 (1988 & Supp. V 1993).1 For the reasons set forth below, the special master’s decision is affirmed.

Background

Sarah Janell Brown, (“Sarah”) received a DTP/polio vaccination on January 17, 1986. Pet. at 1f 3, Ex. 2. In February, 1986, over a month after the administration of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Soriano v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Toibb v. RadloffSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  3. Lisa Munn, Personal Representative of the Estate of Chelsea Vukelich v. The Secretary of the Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1992
  4. Demarest v. ManspeakerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Wisconsin RR Comm. v. C., B. & QRR CO.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API