Ratliff v. Hardison

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶ 1 In this contract action, Daniel Hardison, Sr. appeals from the trial court’s order granting partial summary judgment in favor of appellee Alvin Ratliff on his complaint for damages arising from Hardison’s breach of his agreement to purchase Ratliffs farm. For the reasons below, we affirm.

Facts and Procedural History

¶ 2 We review the facts in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was entered. Andrews v. Blake, 205 Ariz. 236, ¶12, 69 P.3d 7, 11 (2003). In January 2006, Hardison entered into a contract to purchase 1,020 acres of farmland…