Legal Opinion

Corley v. Ott

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided April 21, 1997No. 24604PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

This is an appeal of a final accounting between partners and an award of judgment for breach of a fiduciary duty. We affirm.

FACTS

Appellant Ott held an option to purchase a tract of land known as Lakewood Estates. Without disclosing his option, Ott approached respondent Corley about providing the capital to purchase the land and “making some money on it.” Corley agreed. On March 30,1979, Ott signed a contract to individually purchase Lakewood Estates including 128 lots, a 34.68 acre lot called the “pond tract,” and a water plant, for a purchase price of $171,200. Ott had the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Future Group, II v. NationsbankSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1996
  2. Schymanski v. ConventzAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Stephens v. StephensSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  4. Wyman v. DAVISSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1953
  5. Larsen v. ClaridgeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Sloan v. Greenville CountyCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Kuznik v. Bees Ferry AssociatesCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  3. Moore v. MooreCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  4. Verenes v. AlvanosSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  5. Jordan Ex Rel. Winner's Circle South, L.L.C. v. HoltSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2005

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API