Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Crisler

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1968No. Docket No. 2,500PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The complaint filed by James D. Jackson against defendants Fritz Crisler and Bennie Oosterbaan charges the defendants wrongfully prevented the plaintiff from playing varsity football at the University of Michigan. The defendants moved for accelerated judgment (GCR 1963, 116), claiming the complaint was barred by the statute of limitations, and for summary judgment (GrCR 1963,117), claiming the complaint failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted. The order appealed from directed the entry of an “accelerated judgment of no cause for action.” We agree with the trial judge that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Roche v. BlairMichigan Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Defnet v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Colling v. McGregorMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cree Coaches, Inc. v. Panel Suppliers, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API