Legal Opinion
Millets v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided September 20, 1995No. 94-3004PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GUNTHER, Chief Judge.
Appellant, Michael Millets, defendant below (Millets), appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine. Because the trial court erred in denying Millets’ motion to suppress, we reverse.
Millets was charged by information with possession of cocaine. Prior to trial, Millets moved to suppress three cocaine rocks, arguing that the evidence was the fruit of an illegal search. The evidence at the motion to suppress hearing revealed that on May 18, 1994, Officer Witt (Witt) stopped a car for speeding. After learning the driver’s license was suspended, Witt ordered…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Henry v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Popple v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
- State v. EllisonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Rankin v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Rankin v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998