People v. Philip L. S.
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Term should be reversed and a new trial ordered.
At a trial in 1978 for assault, arising out of a brawl in a public place involving a number of young men, the defendant and four codefendants were represented by one attorney. The defendant claims on this appeal that the court failed to adequately advise him of a potential conflict of interest (People v Gomberg, 38 NY2d 307). We agree.
At the beginning of the trial the court asked the defendant and his codefendants if they were aware of the joint representation, if they had discussed the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. GombergNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. LloydNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
3Cited by3 opinions
- Tylena S. v. Darin J.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- In re Glenn F.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. CabreraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985