Legal Opinion

United States v. Dobbins

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided December 10, 1943No. 10602PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McCORD, Circuit Judge.

United States brought suit to recover on a promissory note. On a hearing the court below, without a jury, found the issue in favor of defendants.

The important facts are without dispute. Prior to the 17th day of October, 1935, the Madison Paint Company, acting through its salesman Brown went to the home of defendants, R. M. Dobbins and wife, in Denton County, Texas, and entered into a contract to sell them certain roofing material and paint to be used on their dwelling and barn, and represented such material to be first-class roofing material and paint, and agreed to…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Guaranty Trust Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. United States v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  5. Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1878

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. TholenDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1960
  2. United States v. SiplerDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1951
  3. United States v. West Texas State BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API