Ex Parte Krothapalli
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
The question presented by this petition for the writ of mandamus is whether certain records of two hospitals relating to a staff physician are privileged under state law and, therefore, not subject to discovery. The trial judge held that the records were discoverable. We conclude that she erred. Therefore, we grant the petition for a writ of mandamus directing the trial judge to vacate her orders compelling discovery and to quash the subpoenas for the records.
Jeanne McCluskey, as personal representative of the estate of Robert V. McCluskey, filed a wrongful-death action against Dr. Radha…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Cruger v. LoveSupreme Court of Florida · 1992
- McGee Ex Rel. Estate of McGee v. Bruce Hospital SystemSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
- BP Exploration & Oil, Inc. v. HopkinsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1996
3Cited by27 opinions
- Mobile Infirmary Medical Center v. HodgenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
- Simcala, Inc. v. American Coal Trade, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2001
- Ex Parte AndersonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
- State ex rel. Charles Town General Hospital v. SandersWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001
- Ex Parte Coosa Valley Health Care, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2000
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.