Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Trolinder

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 11, 1953No. Crim. 2443PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAULSEN, J. pro tem.

After trial before a jury, defendant was convicted on two counts of an information charging violations of sections 288a and 288 of the Penal Code. Thereafter he was found not to be a sexual psyeopath and an application for probation was denied. He was sentenced for the term prescribed by law on each count, the sentences to run concurrently.

His notice of appeal states that he appeals from the judgments and from an order denying his motion for a new trial. The record discloses that no motion for a new trial was made and the subject has not been referred to in the briefs. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. PutnamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
  2. People v. LucasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  3. People v. MeravigliaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
  4. People v. GoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. People v. TerryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  2. State v. ManloveNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. People v. LoignonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. State v. ShamboMontana Supreme Court · 1958
  5. People v. BoyetteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API