Legal Opinion · Dissent

Murr v. Western Assurance Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1900Published

Motion by the plaintiff, Charles Mnrr, for a new trial upon a case containing exceptions, ordered to be heard at the Appellate Division in the first instance, upon the dismissal of the complaint by direction of the court after a trial before the court and a jury at the Erie Trial Term.

1Dissent

McLennan, J. (dissenting):

I cannot concur in the conclusions reached by a majority of the court in this case. The defendant insured the plaintiff’s canal boat George Murr against loss or damage. The policy, among - othei- ” things, provides :

“ In case of loss or misfortune * * * two competent surveyors shall be appointed, one chosen by the insurers and one by the insured or their agents (and in case of disagreement between them they shall appoint an umpire), whose duty it shall be to make specifications in writing under oath, clearly stating both the amount of' work and the manner in which it…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Moore v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
  2. In re Everts' EstateNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Monnot v. IbertNew York Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Kleb v. WallachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  5. Mackey v. WebbNew York Supreme Court · 1889

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API