Legal Opinion

Industrial Commission v. Hineline

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 15, 1933No. 583PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By ROSS, J.

Whether or not there was an accidental injury — that is an injury caused by an accident as distinguished from a disease is a question of fact for the jury.

Certainly there is in the portion of the record quoted sufficient to show an injury, and that it was caused by something more unusual than the ordinary incidents of the man’s, occupation. The slipping of the roll was an accident. The medical testing indicates that his present condition could be due to the sudden strain put upon him.

In the case of Industrial Commission of Ohio v Franken, 126 Oh St, 299, (Oh Bar, May 1,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Industrial Commission v. FrankenOhio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Industrial Commission v. MiddletonOhio Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Esmonde v. Lima Locomotive Works, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Esmonde v. Lima Locomotive Works, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API