Legal Opinion
Bush v. Mulligan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 16, 2008PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*773Since the petitioner raises the question of whether the challenged determination is supported by substantial evidence, and since there were no objections raised that could have terminated the entire proceeding within the meaning of CPLR 7804 (g), the Supreme Court should have transferred the proceeding to this Court without deciding the merits of the petition (see Matter of Dallas v Doar, 45 AD 3d 592, 593 [2007]; Matter of Royster v Goord, 26 AD3d 503, 505 [2006]). Since the record is now before us, we will treat the proceeding as if it had been properly transferred here in its entirety, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- 300 Gramatan Avenue Associates v. State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Royster v. GoordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Dallas v. DoarAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by6 opinions
- Oglesby v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Matter of Rosario v. Municipal Hous. Auth. for City of YonkersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Sussex Condominium III v. County of Rockland Fair Housing BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Sands v. DainesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Rodriguez v. New York City Department of Housing Preservation & DevelopmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.