Legal Opinion

Jankowitz v. Morristown

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 12, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The suit is to enforce liens under the Municipal Mechanics' Lien act which provides that:

"Any person, who * * * shall hereafter * * * perform any labor or furnish any materials toward the performance or completion of any such contract * * * shall * * * have a lien for the value of such labor or materials, or both, upon the moneys in the control of said municipality due or to grow due under said contract * * *."

Morristown built a reservoir. DeLine Elmes were the general contractors. A balance of $4,477.96 is due them. Southern Surety Company, the contractors' bondsman, dispute the liens.

Barson…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. Schaghticoke Powder Co. v. Greenwich & Johnsonville Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Johnson v. StarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
  5. Associated Oil Co. v. Commary-Peterson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Chesebro-Whitman Co., Inc. v. EDENBORO APTS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  2. Leonard D. Sylvester v. Giovannone C.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API