Legal Opinion
Jankowitz v. Morristown
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided August 12, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The suit is to enforce liens under the Municipal Mechanics' Lien act which provides that:
"Any person, who * * * shall hereafter * * * perform any labor or furnish any materials toward the performance or completion of any such contract * * * shall * * * have a lien for the value of such labor or materials, or both, upon the moneys in the control of said municipality due or to grow due under said contract * * *."
Morristown built a reservoir. DeLine Elmes were the general contractors. A balance of $4,477.96 is due them. Southern Surety Company, the contractors' bondsman, dispute the liens.
Barson…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Schaghticoke Powder Co. v. Greenwich & Johnsonville Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Franzen v. Southern Surety Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1926
- Johnson v. StarrettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Associated Oil Co. v. Commary-Peterson Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Chesebro-Whitman Co., Inc. v. EDENBORO APTS.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
- Leonard D. Sylvester v. Giovannone C.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934