Legal Opinion
Augusta Fiberglass Coatings, Inc. v. Fodor Contracting Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1988No. 87-2551PublishedCited by 266 opinions
1Per curiam
The major issue presented by this appeal is whether the district court abused its discretion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 60(b) by denying a motion to vacate a default judgment. We conclude that the district court failed to apply the correct legal standard and that the default judgment should have been set aside.
I
Fodor Contracting Corporation (“Fo-dor”), a New Jersey corporation, was the general contractor for the installation of odor-control equipment at the Cape May County Municipal Utilities Authority composting facility in New Jersey. Augusta Fiberglass Coatings, Inc. (“Augusta”) is a South…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- United States v. Nasser MoradiCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- Central Operating Company v. Utility Workers of America, Afl-CioCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1974
- Werner v. CarboCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Lolatchy v. Arthur Murray, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
- Park Corporation v. Lexington Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by266 opinions
- Walter Bateman v. United States Postal Service William J. Henderson, 1 Postmaster General, and Aaron Johnson Ben Fukumitsu David Burns Jose MallariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers Union, Local No. 59 v. Superline Transportation Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Johnson v. Dayton Electric Manufacturing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- Stephenson Ex Rel. Estate of MJK Clearing, Inc. v. El-BatrawiCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Anthony Fidrych v. Marriott International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
261 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.