Legal Opinion

Perkins v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 26, 1931PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSmith., J.

Appellant wafi convicted under an indictment charging him with the crime of grand larceny, and he seeks by this appeal only to question the sufficiency of the indictment under which he wa,s tried. The indictment alleges that he stole “two animals of the cattle kind, the property of 'Cratus Sterlin. ’ ’ The property alleged to have been stolen was not otherwise described, and it is earnestly insisted that this description is insufficient, for the reason that, if defendant were again tried for the larceny of these animals under a more particular and sufficiently definite description he could…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. DewittSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. State v. GoochSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1895
  3. State v. HallerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  4. State ex rel. Esser v. District Court of the Fifth Judicial District of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of NyeNevada Supreme Court · 1918

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. PachecoNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API