Legal Opinion

Rex-Spanall, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 15, 1968No. C.D. 3291PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Fokd, Judge:

The protest at bar involves an importation of certain vertical building shores which were classified by the collector of customs under the provision in paragraph 372 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified, as machines, not specially provided for, other, and assessed with duty at the rate of 11% per centum ad valorem.

Plaintiff claims the merchandise is properly classifiable under paragraph 312 of the said act, as modified, as columns or posts and all other structural shapes of iron or steel, dutiable at the rate of 7% per centum ad valorem.

The pertinent provisions of the statutes…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Laurence Myers Scaffolding Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Acrow, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1953

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. S.G.B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1979
  2. S. G. B. Steel Scaffolding & Shoring Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1973
  3. Brattner & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API