Legal Opinion
Do-Nguyen v. Clinton
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 1, 2000No. CIV.00CV0267-L(RBB)PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER: (1) GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; (2) DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REMAINING MOTIONS AND EX PARTE APPLICATIONS AS MOOT
LORENZ, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on Defendants President Clinton, Vice President Gore, U.S. Attorney General Janet Reno, IRS Commissioner Charles 0. Ros-soti, IRS Tax Exempt Director Steven T. Miller, and the 98 U.S. Senators’ (“Federal Defendants”) motion to dismiss and Plaintiffs motion for preliminary injunction. The Court finds this matter suitable for submission without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7.1(d)(1).
BACKGROUND
On…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Simon v. Eastern Kentucky Welfare Rights OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Krikorian v. Bank of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
- Outlaw Laboratory, LP v. Trepco Imports & Distribution, Ltd.District Court, S.D. California · 2019
- WROBEL v. STATE OF MAINEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
- WROBEL v. STATE OF MAINEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
- WROBEL v. STATE OF MAINEDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2021
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.