Legal Opinion

United States v. Albert D. Brown

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 10, 1968No. 18027_1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-Appellant appeals from the denial of a motion to correct sentence under Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

On December 3, 1965, the Defendant-Appellant pleaded guilty to a charge of violation of the Dyer Act, 18 U.S.C. § 2312, and received a sentence of three and one half years imprisonment. Prior to sentencing, the Defendant-Appellant had spent sixty-four days in jail awaiting trial. The instant motion, which was denied, was filed on June 15, 1967, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Tennessee requesting that the Court change the sentence to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stapf v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. William Dunn v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
  3. United States v. James Delmar DeatonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1966
  4. Vincent Amato v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  5. Jerome E. Doelle v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1962

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Clifford Laverne JonesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1968
  2. United States v. DunnDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API