Legal Opinion

Knight v. Austin

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 22, 2012No. 27095PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Kittredge

Retired City of Columbia firefighter Robert L. Knight (Appellant) appeals the trial court’s grant of a motion for summary judgment. We affirm.

A series of court orders from the 1970s required the Firemen’s Pension Fund to tender “past due benefits” to Appellant. He now seeks a reimbursement of health insurance benefits as part of those past due benefits through mandamus and contempt. Because the underlying order and this Court’s 1977 opinion do not unambiguously state Appellant is entitled to health insurance benefits, Appellant’s mandamus and contempt claims must be dismissed.

I

In 1974…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fleming v. RoseSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2002
  2. Turner v. MillimanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2011
  3. Bigham v. BighamSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  4. Godwin v. CarriganSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1955
  5. Spartanburg County Department of Social Services v. PadgettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stevens & Wilkinson of South Carolina, Inc. v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  2. James Marlowe v. SCDOTSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2025
  3. Jordan v. DoeCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
  4. Stevens & Wilkinson of South Carolina, Inc. v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2014
  5. Vanessa Williams v. Bradford Q. Jeffcoat, Jr.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API