Legal Opinion

Samson v. Riesing

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 18, 1974No. 233PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHeffernan, J.

This case was decided by granting the motions of the defendants for a directed verdict. The trial judge did.not permit the case to go to the jury; and following the decision on the motions, the jury was dismissed and judgment entered. The plaintiffs argued that the trial judge’s order not only violated this court’s standards for resolving a case on a motion for summary judgment but also followed a procedure which does not have the approval of this court.

We have admonished trial judges that, where there is a motion for directed verdict, it is the better practice to reserve the ruling on the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Zillmer v. MiglautschWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Betehia v. Cape Cod Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Turtenwald v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1972
  4. Tombal v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Edlebeck v. HootenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Weiss v. United Fire & Casualty Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1995
  2. Owen Orthmann v. Apple River Campground, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
  3. Kozlowski v. John E. Smith's Sons Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Schuh v. Fox River Tractor Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Chart Ex Rel. Sommer v. General Motors Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API