Legal Opinion

Kirby v. Employment Security Department

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 10, 2014No. 69807-9-IPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.

¶1 When the record supports a finding that an employee was fired for failing to follow the employer’s directions but the employer fails to show that the directions were reasonable and that the failure to follow them was deliberate, willful, or purposeful, the employee’s conduct does not rise to the level of misconduct disqualifying the employee from receiving unemployment benefits. Here, the commissioner found that the employee acted out of apprehension and confusion, rather than out of a conscious intent to harm the employer when she refused to follow her employer’s instructions. Further,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Everett Concrete Products, Inc. v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Verizon Northwest, Inc. v. Wash. Emp. SEC. Dept.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Hamel v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Darkenwald v. Employment Security DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
  2. Pinnacle Bancorp v. MoritzNebraska Supreme Court · 2023
  3. Elvira Davison v. State Of Wa Dept Of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  4. Jeff Kirby, Apps. v. State Of Wa/dept. Of Employment Security, Resp.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2015
  5. Linda Darkenwald v. State Of Washington Department Of Employment SecurityCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API