Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Martin

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 5, 1962PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

James S. Brown,

Justice of the Supreme Court and Acting Surrogate. The petitioner institutes this proceeding to have the compensation of the respondents, her former attorneys, for legal services rendered to her in this estate fixed and determined. Petitioner is the widow of testator, one of the four executors of the estate and the legatee and devisee of one half of the net estate. The respondents have filed their answer to the petition setting up, in general terms, the services rendered by them to petitioner, as coexecutrix and as beneficiary. They admit payments on account of their services…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of GutchessAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  2. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. v. StarkOhio Court of Appeals · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API