Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Rao v. Adams

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 28, 1947PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

By resort to a writ of habeas corpus, a relator, be he defendant or witness, is entitled to the constitutional protection against being held °unreasonably or in excessive bail. (N. Y. Const., art. I, § 5.) Belief will be granted, however, only to prevent invasion of constitutional right, not because of difference of opinion as to the amount fixed.

In view of the facts here presented — for instance, the seriousness of the crime under investigation, murder; the character, reputation, background and extensive criminal records of relators; their relationship to others against whom they may be…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Lobell v. McDonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1947
  2. People ex rel. Rothensies v. SearlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1930

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Klein v. KruegerNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  2. State v. MastrianSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  3. People Ex Rel. Gross v. Sheriff of the City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. People ex rel. Fusco v. RyanNew York Supreme Court · 1953
  5. People ex rel. Cooke v. McNultyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API