Wilke & Holzheiser, Inc. v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control
California Supreme Court
1DissentPeters, J.
I dissent. The constitutionality of the price provisions of the Alcoholic Beverage Control Act, commonly known as the liquor fair trade law, is the basic question here involved. In 1959, in Allied Properties v. Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control, 53 Cal.2d 141 [346 P.2d 737], the constitutionality of the statute was upheld in a 4-to-3 decision. In June of this year this court decided to reconsider that decision. Upon such reconsideration the majority have reaffirmed Allied Properties, supra. I dissented in 1959 and I dissent now.
The issues in 1959 were whether the statute accomplished…
2Cases cited63 opinions
- Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- In Re EstradaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1965
- Sunshine Anthracite Coal Co. v. AdkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Carter v. Carter Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Schwegmann Bros. v. Calvert Distillers Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1951
58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.