Legal Opinion

In Re Marriage of Anderson

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided February 11, 1985No. 84-0826PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Strouse

The respondent, Richard Anderson, appeals from an order of the trial court that restricted his visitation rights and denied his petition for a rule to show cause. His principal assignment of error in this court is the trial court’s order restricting his visitation rights.

The petitioner, Janet Sue Anderson, a/k/a Janet Sue Senseney, and the respondent were married on August 10, 1968. Two children, Justin and Marc, were born as a result of the parties’ union. Their marriage was dissolved in Cook County on November 14, 1979, pursuant to Janet’s petition for dissolution. A written separation…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Fuller v. JusticeAppellate Court of Illinois · 1983
  2. Coons v. WilderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  3. Pecora v. SzaboAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  4. Wilson v. Continental Body Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1981
  5. In re Marriage of KesslerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Vole, Inc. v. GeorgacopoulosAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989
  2. Gruse v. BellineAppellate Court of Illinois · 1985
  3. Mead v. BOARD OF REVIEW OF McHENRY CTY.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1986
  4. Cuellar v. HoutAppellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  5. Magnuson v. SchaiderAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API