Legal Opinion

Woodcock v. Campbell

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided June 15, 1835PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Assumpsit by Campbell, in the Circuit Court of ■Lauderdale, on an instrument in writing, payable at the United States Branch Bank at Nashville, on the twenty third of April, 1832. The case came up on exceptions to the charge of the Court below. The defendant was first indorser of the paper sued on, which was drawn in his favor by one Boggs.

Read the full summary

Assumpsit by Campbell, in the Circuit Court of ■Lauderdale, on an instrument in writing, payable at the United States Branch Bank at Nashville, on the twenty third of April, 1832. The case came up on exceptions to the charge of the Court below. The defendant was first indorser of the paper sued on, which was drawn in his favor by one Boggs. It was attempted to he defended on the ground, that no demand had been made at the Bank, nor had suit .’been brought against Boggs, as required in the case of indorsers; for it was insisted, that this case came within the statutes of 1828 — ’9 : but the…

1Opinion of the Court

By Mr. justice Thorn’¡'on :

This was an action of assumpsit, brought by Campbell, the defendant in error, against Woodcock} as endorser of a writing obligatory, executed on the 23d of April, 1831, by one George Boggs, jr, whereby he promised to pay the amount therein named, to the said Woodcock, twelve months after date, at the Office of Discount and Deposit of the Bank United States at Nashville; who indorsed the same to one Donahoo, who endorsed to the plaintiff below. The bill of exceptions gives all the testimony, and shews that there was none of any law of Tennessee. The only questions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bank of United States v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1826
  2. Wolcott v. Van SantvoordNew York Supreme Court · 1819

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Marquette National Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Bates v. RylandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1844
  3. Holt v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  4. Hall v. ChiltonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1842
  5. Pearson v. MitchellSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API