Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Hucko

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided September 17, 2001Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Order dated July 12, 2000 affirmed, with $10 costs.

Order dated December 4, 2000 reversed, without costs, and tenant’s motion to vacate the default judgment is granted.

Civil Court correctly ruled that the prohibition of General Business Law § 352-eeee (2) (c) (ii) against owner occupancy proceedings by cooperative owners against nonpurchasing tenants is not available to appellant, in light of the foreclosure of the cooperative’s mortgage, judicial sale, and subsequent conveyance to the individual petitioners. Where cooperative ownership of a building no longer exists,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corp. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Picinic v. Seatrain Lines, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
  3. Nestor v. BrittAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API