Legal Opinion

Robert M. Nesmith v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided March 7, 1983No. 82-4162PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

The taxpayer claims the three-year statute of limitations of I.R.C. § 6501(a) (1976) 1 began to run when he filed non-fraudulent amended income tax returns, notwithstanding the fact that his original returns were admittedly fraudulent. The Tax Court agreed. However, we interpret the statute as imposing no limitations period under such circumstances, and reverse.

Nesmith and his wife filed fraudulent joint income tax returns for the years 1970, 1971 and 1972. In 1973, after the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) initiated an investigation of the Nesmiths, they filed amended returns for these years.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Espinoza v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1982
  2. Zellerbach Paper Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Bennett v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  4. Alfonzo L. Dowell and Vivian T. Dowell v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Klemp v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1981

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Evans Cooperage Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Badaracco v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Johnson v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API