Legal Opinion

Bedford v. Ruby

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1885PublishedCited by 7 opinions

•Error to the district court for Seward couuty. Heard below before Savidge, J,, sitting for Norval, J.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

The question involved in this cause was submitted to the district court upon a stipulation made by the parties by *98which certain facts were agreed upon, and by which it was agreed that certain documentary evidence should be used upon the trial. A trial was had, and the district court, “after hearing the evidence and the argument of counsel,” entered its finding of facts and of law and rendered its judgment.

It is now sought by proceedings in error to reverse the decision of the district court. There is no bill of exceptions in the record. Under the issues and stipulation the court could legally…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. White v. RourkeNebraska Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Deroin v. JenningsNebraska Supreme Court · 1875
  3. Roehl v. RoehlNebraska Supreme Court · 1884

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. United States, Ex Rel. v. C., O. G. R. R. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1895
  2. BURKE LUMBER & COAL COMPANY v. AndersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  3. State v. LewWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  4. Aspinwall v. SabinNebraska Supreme Court · 1887
  5. State ex rel. Bogle v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API