Legal Opinion

Sizemore, Jake v. Rubin, Scott

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 19, 2024No. 3:20-cv-00251Unknown

1Opinion

FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JAKE J. SIZEMORE, Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. 20-cv-251-wmc SCOTT M. RUBIN and MARIA LEMIEUX, Defendants. This case arises out of the challenges of addressing the mental health needs of incarcerated individuals who engage in self-harm. Plaintiff Jake J. Sizemore, appearing by counsel, contends that the two named defendants, psychologists employed by the Wisconsin Department of Corrections (“DOC”), both failed to prevent him from harming himself and denied him adequate mental health treatment in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights while he was…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Christopher Pyles v. Magid FahimCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  3. Leon Snipes v. George Detella, Doctor Ehrhardt, John L. RussianCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Earnest D. Shields v. Illinois Department of CorrectCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
  5. Calvin Whiting v. Wexford Health Sources, IncorpCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API