Legal Opinion

Clark v. City of Elizabeth

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 20, 1898PublishedCited by 18 opinions

On error to the Supreme Court. On writ of alternative mandamus and return thereto, and demurrer to the return.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Depue, J.

This case was argued in the Supreme Court on a rule to show cause why a mandamus should not issue, and after argument on the rule and decision in the Supreme Court, the pleadings were moulded under the direction of the court, in pursuance of a stipulation in writing made by counsel. The stipulation of counsel was that, upon the decision of the rule to show cause, the pleadings should be so moulded under the direction of the court as to give either party a right to a'writ of error. The proceedings were thereupon amended and made to consist of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Supervisors v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. State v. City of CamdenSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1891
  3. State v. City of ElizabethSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Como Farms, Inc. v. ForanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
  2. DeHart v. BambrickNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  3. Armstrong v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  4. NJ Optometric Ass'n v. Hillman-Kohan Eyeglasses, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1978
  5. American Malleables Co. v. Town of BloomfieldSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API