Legal Opinion
Hudson v. Aceves
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided December 1, 2016No. NUMBER 13-14-00400-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*531OPINION
Opinion by Justice Garza
Paul James Hudson filed an interlocutory appeal challenging the trial court’s temporary order enjoining him from initiating or pursuing legal proceedings in Mexico against Gloria Araceli Loeza Aceves. Hudson asks us to construe the appellate brief as a petition for writ of mandamus in the event that we conclude we lack jurisdiction over the interlocutory appeal.
We lack jurisdiction over the interlocutory appeal, but we find that the trial court abused its discretion, leaving Hudson without an adequate appellate remedy. Accordingly, we will conditionally grant…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re CSX Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2003
- CMH HOMES v. PerezTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Canadian Helicopters Ltd. v. WittigTexas Supreme Court · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- In the Interest of: JN, minor child, RN v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2024
- Dr. Kelly Isbell v. Jeanne Russell, Mission Street Consulting LLC, and Kate Rogers, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2022
- In the Interest of M.S.P. and A.C.A., Children v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2023
- Mayor Ricardo Guerra and City of San Benito, Texas v. Julian Rios, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2025
- in Re Farmers Texas County Mutual Insurance Company, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.