Maas v. Leblanc
New Jersey Court of Chancery
1Opinion of the Court
The complainant, as vendor, seeks the specific performance of a contract for the sale of land to the defendants, as vendees. The sole defense to this action is the alleged unmarketability of the title to said land. The alleged defect is that a deed from a substituted trustee under a foreign will to complainant's predecessor in title was executed, delivered and recorded prior to the filing and recording of an exemplified copy of said will in the office of the surrogate of the county wherein the land lies. The claim of the defendants is that this is an absolute nullity because the recording of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Newton v. . BronsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1856
- State v. KuehnleSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1913
- Scott v. Blades Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1907
- Tudor v. TudorSupreme Court of Vermont · 1907
- In re DevineNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Maas v. LeblangSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928