Legal Opinion

Bollin v. Hooper

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1901PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Error to Wayne; Hosmer, J. Assumpsit by John Bollin against Frederick B. Hooper for labor performed and material furnished in the construction of a building. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This suit was brought in justice’s court, where plaintiff recovered a judgment. The case was appealed to the circuit court, where, after a trial by jury, plaintiff again recovered judgment. The case is brought here by writ of error.

In the spring of 1899 Mr. Hooper contracted with one Schneider to build him a two-story, brick-veneer dwelling-house upon a lot he owned in Detroit. Mr. Schneider contracted with the plaintiff to do the brick and mason work *288for $885. On the 21st of April the plaintiff, in a letter addressed to the defendant, waived any claim to a lien on the building for his work.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barnard v. McLeodMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  2. Aspell v. HosbeinMichigan Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rott v. GoldmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  2. Vorrath v. GarreltsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1973
  3. Wildey v. GillettMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Adams v. Central City Granite Brick & Block Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Stone v. StreilMichigan Supreme Court · 1925

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API