Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Vanmeter

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided October 4, 1876PublishedCited by 3 opinions

APPEAL PROM HARDIN CIRCUIT COURT.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Cofer :

The warrant in this case is in substantial conformity to the requirements of Secs. 24 and 321 of the Criminal Code, and the court erred in quashing it. If it had not been originally sufficient the amendment proposed should have been allowed. The amendment would not have changed the character of the prosecution, nor would it have infringed the rule that the case tried in the circuit court, on appeal, must be the same case which was tried in the inferior court.

An indictment can only be found and presented by a grand jury, and therefore no amendment of an indictment can be…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Bullion v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  3. Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API