Legal Opinion
Universal Industries Corp. v. Lindstrom
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 28, 1983PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
SCHNEPP, J.
This appeal concerns defendants’ liability for goods procured from plaintiff by defendant Dana Lindstrom which were, according to the invoices, sold and shipped to “Kimco *151Warehousing Inc/Dana Lindstrom & Assoc” between August 31, 1979 and December 20, 1979. These transactions occurred prior to the incorporation of corporate defendants. Special Term granted summary judgment to Lindstrom dismissing the complaint against him, and it denied the cross motion of the corporate defendants for summary judgment. Plaintiff’s cross motion to examine the defendants before…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rotuba Extruders, Inc. v. CepposNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Renda v. FrazerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Tarolli Lumber Co. v. AndreassiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977
- In re Arbitration between Reif & Williams Sportswear, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1961
3Cited by11 opinions
- Illinois Controls, Inc. v. LanghamOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Clinton Investors Co. v. WatkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Oost-Lievense v. North American Consortium, PCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Illinois Controls, Inc. v. LanghamOhio Supreme Court · 1994
- Lansco Corp. v. NY Brauser Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.