Legal Opinion

Vassallo v. Goldwire

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 14, 2009No. 1D09-919PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this workers’ compensation appeal, Appellant argues the Judge of Compensation Claims (JCC) erred by dismissing, with prejudice, his attorney’s fee claim for lack of prosecution pursuant to section 440.25(4)(i), Florida Statutes (2008). For the reasons explained below, we agree and reverse.

In 1996, Appellant represented a claimant at a mediation, which resulted in a joint stipulation. Pursuant to the stipulation, Appellees agreed to pay certain benefits and jurisdiction was reserved “for any attorney’s fee due and owing in conjunction with the claim.” On September 19, 2008, Appellees filed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Amendments to the Florida Rules of Workers' Compensation ProcedureSupreme Court of Florida · 2004
  2. Zaldivar v. Okeelanta Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004
  3. Regal Wood Products, Inc. v. MendezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1983
  4. Florida Power & Light Co. v. CallahanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. PIZZA HUT, INCORPORATED/YUM! BRANDS, INC. v. GiraldoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API