Goodleaf v. Tzivos Hashem, Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the third-party defendant Arnold Steel Company (hereinafter Arnold) for summary judgment dismissing the third-party complaint insofar as asserted against it. In response to Arnold’s prime facie showing that the plaintiff did not sustain a “grave injury” as defined by Workers’ Compensation Law § 11, the appellant failed to raise a triable issue of fact (see Rubeis v Aqua Club, Inc., 3 NY3d 408 [2004]; DePaola v Albany Med. Coll., 40 AD3d 678 [2007]; O’Berg v MacManus Group, Inc., 33 AD3d 599 [2006]; Fitzpatrick v Chase Manhattan Bank, 285 AD2d…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Lucido v. MancusoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Rubies v. Aqua Club, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Fitzpatrick v. Chase Manhattan BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Mackenzie v. CroceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Szczepanski v. Dandrea Construction Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Silva v. FC Beekman Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Fried v. Always Green, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Kitkas v. Windsor Place Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Del Vecchio v. Danielle Associates, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.