Legal Opinion · Dissent

Commonwealth v. DeJesus

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided November 22, 2002No. 00-P-1367Published

1DissentKantrowitz, J.

I

I agree that observations made while securing the premises may not be included in the warrant application. Commonwealth v. Blake, 413 Mass. 823, 830 (1992). I further agree with the opinion’s central holding: the police, who possess probable cause to believe that evidence of criminal activity is present, and are in the process of securing a search warrant,1 may enter the apartment so long as they have a reasonable basis for concluding the evidence will be destroyed.

*538h

Here, two affidavits, totaling fourteen pages, accompanied the warrant application.2 One sentence concerned observations made…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BlakeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1992
  2. Commonwealth v. Perez-BaezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1991
  3. Commonwealth v. MelendezMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. RussellMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1999
  5. Commonwealth v. HillMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API