Legal Opinion
State v. Cone
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided August 5, 1877PublishedCited by 1 opinion
Indictment, for murder. The defendant excepted to the ruling that a witness called by the state, whose testimony, given at the magistrate’s examination, had been written by the magistrate and signed by the witness, should not be asked, on cross-examination, by counsel having the written testimony, what that testimony was.
1Opinion of the CourtDoe, C. J.
The ruling was in accordance with the practice approved in Haines v. R. F. Ins. Co., 52 N. H. 467, and is not subject to exception.
Exception overruled.
Bingham and Allen, JJ., did not sit.
2Cited by1 opinion
- Villineuve v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905