Legal Opinion

Crosby v. Crosby

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided December 8, 1983No. 82-CA-205PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion

*1249ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

Our original opinion is reported at 434 So.2d 162. Subsequently, we granted a rehearing and heard oral arguments.

While the merits of the rehearing were under advisement, the following joint motion was filed by the parties:

“It is stipulated by and between the plaintiff and defendant that this suit has been compromised and settled and the parties move it be dismissed with prejudice, each party to pay its own respective costs.”

Accordingly, a ruling on the rehearing is moot and will not be forthcoming.

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crosby v. CrosbyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1983

4Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bishop v. Shelter Ins. Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1984