Legal Opinion

Whitaker v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama

Decided May 5, 1995No. CR-94-247PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LONG, Judge.

The appellant, Wendell Eugene Whitaker, appeals from the dismissal of his petition for post-conviction relief filed pursuant to Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., which attacked the revocation of his probation. On appeal, the appellant contends that the trial court erroneously dismissed his Rule 32 petition without an evidentiary hearing. We agree.

On October 1, 1994, the appellant filed a petition for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 32, Ala.R.Crim.P., in the Circuit Court of Houston County. In that petition, the appellant alleged that he was denied due process because, he said, his…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1975
  4. Ex Parte BoatwrightSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Durry v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API