Legal Opinion

Norman v. Durham

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 8, 1964No. 49545PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRITCHARD, Commissioner.

This is an action for declaratory judgment as to the rights of the parties to a joint adventure agreement, dated December 2, 1954, for the development of residential subdivisions in the southeast part of Joplin, Missouri, in which the plaintiffs sought also a direction to the trustee to whom the parties had conveyed their “pooled” real properties to reimburse them for certain developmental expenses, and ultimately for the partition of 143 lots remaining unsold in the hands of the trustee as between the parties plaintiffs and defendants. The defendants, by answer,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Faire v. BurkeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
  2. Missouri State Life Insurance v. FosterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
  3. Swain v. MaxwellSupreme Court of Missouri · 1946
  4. Buchanan v. Louisiana Purchase Exposition Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
  5. Bogad v. WachterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Aetna Casualty & Surety Company v. HaasSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  2. Independence Flying Service, Inc. v. AilshireSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  3. L & K Realty Co. v. R. W. Farmer Construction Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Robson v. United Pacific Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1965
  5. Hawkins v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1995

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API