Flores v. Raz
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.
¶ 1. Jack Raz (Raz) and his wife, *310Margot, appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Dave Flores and Greg Montoto. Raz argues that the trial court erred: (1) in determining that, despite the lack of an express clause in the business purchase agreement making the Wisconsin State Fair Park Board's (Board) approval of the sale a contingency, the Board's approval was an implied condition precedent subject to performance within a reasonable period of time; (2) in finding that the two-year delay in approving the sale constituted an unreasonable time period; and (3) in ruling that…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
- Delap v. Institute of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- Foreman v. E. Caligari & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1963
- Kelley v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
- Oremus v. WynhoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Flores v. RazCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001