Legal Opinion

Flores v. Raz

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided December 27, 2001No. 01-1104PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCurley, J.

¶ 1. Jack Raz (Raz) and his wife, *310Margot, appeal from the trial court's grant of summary judgment to Dave Flores and Greg Montoto. Raz argues that the trial court erred: (1) in determining that, despite the lack of an express clause in the business purchase agreement making the Wisconsin State Fair Park Board's (Board) approval of the sale a contingency, the Board's approval was an implied condition precedent subject to performance within a reasonable period of time; (2) in finding that the two-year delay in approving the sale constituted an unreasonable time period; and (3) in ruling that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Voss v. City of MiddletonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Delap v. Institute of America, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Foreman v. E. Caligari & Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1963
  4. Kelley v. EllisWisconsin Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Oremus v. WynhoffWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Flores v. RazCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API